The Boston Red Sox have a policy about retiring their players numbers.
It goes as follows:
• Election to the National Baseball Hall of Fame
• At least 10 years played with the Red Sox
Now there is something to be said about that...
It makes sure that only legitmately great players get their jersey retired.
(I guess Rich "El Guapo" Garces won't have a ceremony any time soon.)
And it also prevents players who only had a cup of coffee with the Red Sox to be honored.
(No retiring #41 for Tom Seaver I guess.)
And nobody can argue the numbers retired for Red Sox players represent some of their greatest players.
Bobby Doerr. Joe Cronin. Carl Yastrzemski. Ted Williams. Carlton Fisk.
But it is also excessive.
And if the Hall of Fame is too stupid to keep Jim Rice out, then the Sox should do the right thing and retire his number anyway.
He was the captain, a consistent MVP candidate and maintained the tradition of terrifying hitters in left field.
Put the policy to bed and hang #14 up there.
Nobody has worn #14 besides Jim Ed Rice since 1975 anyway, so why not make it official?
I suppose with one more year of eligibility they are hoping Rice gets elected and he finally gets his due at Fenway.
But I say "Why wait?"
If the Reds can retire Ted Kluszewski's number, then I think the Red Sox can honor Rice.
Have you looked at the Astros retired numbers?
(I am guessing the answer to that question will be no)
No offense but Jimmy Wynn?
Why not Bob Watson?
Retiring numbers is an emotional ceremony and it should be used to honor the players who honored their team.
No doubt the Yankees will retire Joe Torre, Derek Jeter and Marion Rivera's numbers.
I know some people think the Yankees retire too many numbers but I think it is cool...
Obviously you retire Gehrig, Ruth, DiMaggio, Berra, Mantle, Ford and Stengel
But why not also honor Howard, Munson, Maris, Jackson, Rizzuto, Martin, Mattingly and Guidry?
Which one of those players didn't honor the Yankees?
The Hall of Fame rule should be reviewed.
Chances are Big Papi won't be a Hall of Famer (he won't have enough MVP caliber seasons) and probably won't play 5 more seasons and meet the 10 year minimum.
But shouldn't he have his #34 retired?
Or take a sure fire Hall of Famer, Pedro Martinez.
He only played 7 years for the Red Sox but gave the Sox one of their most dynamic aces in their history (and was a big member of the 2004 World Champs.)
How could you not retire his #45?
And besides, with the 10 year hall of fame rule, the Red Sox should have retired #26 for Wade Boggs. But they didn't
I guess because his number was retired in Tampa for his storied career as a Devil Ray.
Loosen up Red Sox...
Jim has earned it.
Retire his number
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Hey Red Sox... retire Jim Rice's number!
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Well, Rice is in, so the Sox will retire his number during this season.ReplyDelete
As for Pedro... no. Nomar? No. There's more honor in joining an elusive club than joining one that anyone can get in to. The way the yankees are going, they'll run out of numbers to wear in ten years.
AS for Rivera... uh... they can't really retire #42 again now can they?
Rice is now a lock.ReplyDelete
The Sox have done a fine job limiting retired numbers to those players who were either totally faithful to the team (Johnny Pesky), or if not, faithful to the fans for years afterwards (Carton Fisk).
There are impact players loved by fans, but they just miss the cut. Examples include Louis Tiant, Dwight Evans, and Nomar (the greatest Shortstop we ever had!).
But Jim Rice is now locked-in.
And I think Pedro is also a lock if and when he enters the HOF.